Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index Research Articles

Enthesitis and Dactylitis Resolution with Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Integrated Analysis of the Randomized KEEPsAKE 1 and 2 Trials.

The presence (vs absence) of enthesitis/dactylitis is associated with greater psoriatic arthritis (PsA) activity and reduced health-related quality of life. Risankizumab, an interleukin 23 antagonist, demonstrated superior treatment efficacy over placebo in patients with PsA, including enthesitis/dactylitis. Herein, we report the efficacy of risankizumab on complete resolution of enthesitis and/or dactylitis and improvements in patient-reported outcomes in patients with PsA. This integrated post hoc analysis of data from KEEPsAKE 1 and KEEPsAKE 2 included patients with baseline enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index > 0) and/or dactylitis (Leeds Dactylitis Index > 0). Efficacy outcomes at weeks 24 and 52 included proportion of patients achieving enthesitis and/or dactylitis resolution and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue. Of 1407 patients, approximately 63%, 28%, and 20% had baseline enthesitis, dactylitis, and both enthesitis/dactylitis, respectively. At week 24, higher response rates were observed for risankizumab vs placebo for resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis, and both enthesitis/dactylitis (differences of 13.9%, 16.9%, and 13.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). By week 52, risankizumab treatment resulted in complete resolution of enthesitis, dactylitis, and both enthesitis and dactylitis in 55.0%, 76.1%, and 52.3% of patients; similar resolution rates occurred among patients who switched from placebo to risankizumab. Among risankizumab-treated patients who achieved resolution of enthesitis and/or dactylitis, MCIDs were also attained in patient-reported pain, disability, and fatigue at week 24 (all p < 0.05; except fatigue in patients with resolution of both enthesitis/dactylitis); responses were sustained through week 52. Higher proportions of risankizumab-treated (vs placebo-treated) patients achieved enthesitis and/or dactylitis resolution and meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes at week 24 and generally sustained responses at week 52. Thus, risankizumab may result in sustained alleviation of PsA-related pathognomonic musculoskeletal lesions of enthesitis/dactylitis. NCT03675308, and NCT03671148.

Factors associated with discrepancies in disease activity as assessed by SDAI and RAPID3 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Data from a multicenter observational study (T-FLAG).

The present study aimed to examine discrepancies between assessments based on Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) in RA patients with controlled disease activity. Data from 464 RA patients in SDAI remission or low disease activity (REM/LDA) were analyzed. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, including Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25), and Kihon checklist (KCL), were assessed. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with RAPID3 moderate or high disease activity (MDA/HDA). Cutoff values of RAPID3 MDA/HDA for each PRO evaluation item were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Among RA patients in SDAI REM/LDA, 84.9% were in RAPID3 REM/LDA. Multivariable analysis revealed that HAQ-DI, GLFS-25, and KCL were independently associated with RAPID3 MDA/HDA. Subdomain analysis of KCL revealed that activities of daily living, physical function, cognitive function, and depressive mood were significantly associated with RAPID3 MDA/HDA. Cutoff values for HAQ-DI and KCL were 0.38 and 8, respectively. In RA patients with controlled disease activity, discrepancies between RAPID3 and SDAI assessments were observed, with factors such as HAQ-DI, GLFS-25, and KCL being independently associated with RAPID3 MDA/HDA.

Preliminary Study on Pulse Wave Changes in Patients with Inflammatory Arthropathies Treated with bDMARDs.

Background: Patients with inflammatory arthropathies exhibit an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk as compared to the general population, which is not fully quantified by the conventional CVD risk scores. Biotechnological disease-modifying drugs (bDMARDs) have proved beneficial to reduce the overall CVD risk in these patients, although CVD remains a major cause of increased mortality. Since it has been shown that pulse wave parameters and in particular carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) are predictors of CVD risk, the aim of this study was to evaluate their changes in patients with inflammatory arthropathies before and after bDMARD therapy. Methods: Pulse wave parameters were evaluated with applanation tonometry in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), before and after two years of bDMARD therapy. Results: At baseline, cfPWV was significantly associated with age (p < 0.001) and, among pulse wave parameters, the subendocardial viability ratio was negatively associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.04) and the HAQ-disability index (p = 0.03). At baseline, PsA patients showed a higher percentage of male subjects, higher CRP, and the highest cfPWV values (p = 0.048). After two years, pulse wave parameters improved in the AS and RA groups, but not in the PsA group. Conclusions: Our data confirm that pulse wave parameters are potentially reversible after bDMARD therapy, as they improved in AS and RA patients. In PsA patients, there were no changes, which may be due to the higher percentage of male subjects and higher baseline cfPWV values.

Central sensitization significantly deteriorates functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Central sensitization has a major role in health-related parameters in musculoskeletal conditions. There is still a lack of understanding regarding the impact of central sensitization on the interpretation of disease activity and functional disability in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) was used to screen for central sensitization. Disease-related parameters, including objective tests, medication use, the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI), and the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), were assessed. Functionality, quality of life, sleep, and mental health were evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Scale (JSS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. The effect of central sensitization on functionality and disease activity measures was assessed by regression analyses. The frequency of central sensitization was 65% in patients with pSS (n = 60). Patients with central sensitization had higher HAQ-DI, ESSPRI, HADS, and JSS and lower SF-36 subdomain scores (p < 0.05 for all). A significant positive correlation was observed between the CSI scoreand theESSPRI, JSS, HAQ-DI, and HADS scores (Spearman's rho ranging from 0.342 to 0.739). The multiple regression analysis indicated that CSI was independently associated with HAQ-DI (adjusted R2 = 0.19, B = 0.01) and ESSPRI (adjusted R2 = 0.45, B = 0.08) (p < 0.001 for all). This study confirms that central sensitization has a major impact on functionality and the interpretation of self-reported disease activity in pSS. When devising strategies for the management of patients with pSS, it is crucial to consider these close relationships. Key Points • The frequency of central sensitization accompanying primary Sjögren's syndrome is considerable. • Central sensitization was independently associated with functionality and self-reported disease activity assessment. • This close association leads to challenges in functionality, evaluating treatment response, and planning or switching between therapies in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Correlation between disease activity and patient-reported health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study

ObjectiveWe aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of different activities and to evaluate the correlation between clinical activity...

Predictors of Remission or Combined Remission and Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Taiwan: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify predictors of remission or low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and low-ultrasound inflammation. Methods: A total of 80 patients with RA who fulfilled the 1987 ACR criteria for RA with a disease activity score of 28 joints (DAS28) > 3.2 were recruited. Over 1 year of therapy, we conducted blood tests every 6 months to examine erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), neuraminidase 3 (Neu3), and α-2,3-sialyltrasnferse I (ST3Gal-1) levels in B cells and monocytes. Additionally, we evaluated physical function by using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Data on demographic and clinical parameters were collected, and musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed twice a year on 12 specific joints to assess synovial changes. One year later, we compared all collected data and laboratory or ultrasound results between patients achieving remission or LDA and those who did not in order to determine the predictors. Results: Age, the presence or absence of rheumatoid factor, and the number of conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used were not correlated with remission or LDA for DAS28 or Simplified Disease Activity Index formulas. However, male sex, low CRP levels, low ESR levels, and low HAQ-DI scores were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving remission or LDA for DAS28-ESR. Negative anticyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) and low HAQ-DI scores were predictors of remission or LDA for DAS28-MCP-1. Interestingly, having less than two comorbidities is a good predictor of a combined remission/low disease activity state for SDAI and DAS28-MCP-1. Furthermore, Neu3 and ST3Gal-1 levels and ST3Gal-1/Neu3 ratios in B cells and monocytes had no significant correlation with total ultrasound scores. Nevertheless, monocyte ST3Gal-1 and Neu3 correlated significantly with DAS28-ESR >5.1 and DAS-MCP-1 >4.8 (both categories belong to high disease activity), respectively (rho = 0.609 with p = 0.012, and rho = 0.727 with p = 0.011, respectively). Monocyte ST3Gal-1/Neu3 ratios connected with DAS28-ESR >5.1 and 3.3 < SDAI ≦ 11 (low disease activity), respectively (rho = 0.662 with p = 0.005, and rho = 0.342 with p = 0.048, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with RA in Taiwan, male sex, low CRP levels, low ESR levels, and low HAQ-DI scores are predictors of remission or LDA for DAS28-ESR, which differ from the predictors for DAS28-MCP-1. Moreover, monocyte ST3Gal-1, Neu3, and their ratios correlated with different disease activity categories of DAS28-ESR, DAS28-MCP-1, and SDAI scores.

OA04 Efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis: the multicenter, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2a IRIS-RA study

Abstract Background/Aims Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with autoantibodies. Despite the use of targeted therapies, up to half of patients fail to achieve remission or low disease activity (LDA). Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), key autoantibodies that predict progression of joint destruction in RA, are largely an immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype. Nipocalimab is a high affinity, fully human, IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is designed to selectively block the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), preventing recirculation and thereby lowering IgG levels, potentially including ACPAs and other pathogenic antibodies. In this phase 2a proof-of-concept study (IRIS-RA; NCT04991753), we report the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in patients with moderate to severe, active RA. Methods Eligible adult patients with moderate to severe RA (≥6 swollen/tender joints), positive for ACPA or rheumatoid factor, and ≥1 advanced therapies, were randomized 3:2 to receive intravenous 15 mg/kg nipocalimab or placebo every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who achieved ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses, DAS28-CRP remission, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12. Results In total, 53 patients were enrolled (nipocalimab, n = 33; placebo, n = 20). Most patients were female (67.9%) and white (90.6%) with a median age of 59 (range, 26-74) years. Demographic and baseline disease characteristics were comparable between groups except higher CRP in placebo. At Week 12, patients treated with nipocalimab showed a numerically greater mean (standard deviation [SD]) change in DAS28-CRP score compared to the placebo group (-1.17 [1.34] vs -0.62 [0.96]; mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.45 [-1.17-0.28]; p=0.224). A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses compared to placebo. In the nipocalimab group, 7 (21.2%) patients achieved DAS28-CRP remission compared to 2 (10.0%) patients in the placebo group (treatment difference, 9.9% [-9.5-29.3%]; p=0.456). Similarly, patients in the nipocalimab group had a numerically greater mean (SD) improvement in HAQ-DI score (-0.27 [0.55] vs -0.11 [0.36], respectively). The proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 81.8% vs 60.0% in the nipocalimab vs placebo groups. In the nipocalimab group, 3 serious TEAEs were reported, including burn infection, infusion-related reaction, and deep-vein thrombosis. There were no TEAEs that led to death. Conclusion Treatment with nipocalimab resulted in consistent and numerically higher improvements across ACR20, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 responses, as well as DAS28-CRP, DAS28-CRP remission, and HAQ-DI, with acceptable safety profile. Nipocalimab showed activity in patients with moderate to severe RA and warrants further investigation to understand the predictors of nipocalimab response. Disclosure P.C. Taylor: Consultancies; AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi, Aqtual, and UCB. Grants/research support; Galapagos. G. Schett: None. F. Ibrahim: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. B. Zhou: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. J. Leu: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. S. Liva: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. Q. Wang: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. R. Rojo Cella: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. C.S. Karyekar: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development. K. Fei: Corporate appointments; Employee of Janssen Research &amp; Development.

P170 Ixekizumab significantly improved quality of life and joint pain in patients with psoriatic arthritis, nail disease and distal interphalangeal joint involvement from SPIRIT-H2H

Abstract Background/Aims Among adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the SPIRIT H2H study, 65% had nail psoriasis (PsO) at baseline and of these, 96.2% had simultaneous distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) disease in ≥ 1 digits at baseline. This analysis describes the impact of ixekizumab (IXE) and adalimumab (ADA) on quality of life (QoL), function and joint pain. Methods This post-hoc analysis included patients from SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) treated with either IXE or ADA who had simultaneous nail and DIP involvement (swelling or tenderness) in ≥ 1 digits at baseline. Nail PsO was measured using Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). Joint involvement was measured by tender/swollen joint count scores. Joint pain was measured by patient’s assessment of pain using Visual Analogue Scale (100 mm). QoL measures included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Short Form-36 Mental and Physical Component Summary Scores (SF-36 MCS/PCS). Patients were evaluated at baseline and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52. Joint pain and SF-36 MCS/PCS changes from baseline were analysed using a mixed effects model of repeated measures. Proportions of patients achieving DLQI ≤1 or HAQ-DI change ≥0.35 (minimal clinically important difference) were analysed using logistic regressions. Non-responder imputation and modified baseline observation carried forward methods were used for missing data. Results 354 SPIRIT-H2H patients had a NAPSI total score &amp;gt;0 and DIP involvement in ≥ 1 digits simultaneously at baseline (IXE, N = 186 and ADA, N = 168). Among them, IXE-treated patients had a significant improvement in joint pain at Week 4 and a larger improvement in joint pain over 52 weeks vs ADA-treated patients. In addition, a larger proportion of IXE-treated patients achieved a DLQI score of 0 or 1, and these statistically significant differences were observed as early as Week 4 and sustained at each visit over 52 weeks. IXE-treated patients also experienced statistically significant improvements in SF-36 MCS at Week 4, 12 and 32 compared to ADA-treated patients; numerically greater improvements in favor of IXE were sustained at all other visits. IXE-treated patients showed a larger improvement in SF-36 PCS over 52 weeks vs ADA-treated patients, and these differences reached statistical significance at Week 24 and 32. Similar proportions of patients treated with IXE or ADA showed a clinically important improvement in HAQ-DI. Conclusion In patients with simultaneous nail and DIP involvement in ≥ 1 digit at baseline, IXE treatment resulted in significant improvements across multiple QoL measures, and greater improvements in joint pain compared to ADA treatment. These data may help health care providers make clinical decisions concerning the care of PsA in patients with nail and DIP involvement. Disclosure C. Ritchlin: Consultancies; C. Ritchlin has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or grant support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. A. Kavanaugh: Consultancies; A. Kavanaugh has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. L. Kristensen: Consultancies; L.E. Kristensen has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or research support from: Pfizer, AbbVie, Amgen, UCB Pharma, Gilead, Biogen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen. J. Merola: Consultancies; J. F. Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Janssen, UCB Pharma, Sanofi-Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Biogen, Pfizer. B. Strober: Corporate appointments; B. Strober has been serving as an Editor-in-Chief for the Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis; and serving as scientific co-director and investigator for CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry. Consultancies; B. Strober has served as a speaker for and/or has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from: AbbVie, Alamar, Alumis, Almirall, Amgen, Arcutis, Arena, Aristea, Asana, Boehringer Ingelheim. Shareholder/stock ownership; reports having stock options in Connect Biopharma, Mindera Health. Honoraria; He is also a consultant for Immunic Therapeutics, Kangpu Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Connect Biopharma, Dermavant, Evelo Biosciences, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly and Company, Maruho. Grants/research support; He is also a consultant for Meiji Seika Pharma, Mindera Health, Protagonist, Nimbus, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Sun Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Union Therapeutics, Ventyxbio, vTv Therapeutic. J. Lisse: Consultancies; J. Lisse is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. R. Bolce: Shareholder/stock ownership; R. Bolce is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. C. Sapin: Shareholder/stock ownership; C. Sapin is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. J. Pustizzi: Shareholder/stock ownership; J. Pustizzi is employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. D. McGonagle: Consultancies; D. McGonagle has received consulting fees and/or honoraria and/or research grants from: AbbVie and Eli Lilly and Company. Grants/research support; His funding sources include or have included the Wellcome Trust-EPSRC, UK NIHR, ARUK, MRC UK and EU FP7 programme.

P188 Frailty and its impact on patient-reported outcomes in polymyalgia rheumatica

Abstract Background/Aims Frailty is an increasingly important construct in the field of rheumatology, aiding the identification of individuals with increased vulnerability to accelerated clinical decline, and overall worse disease outcomes. The aim of this research was to explore the prevalence of frailty and its potential associated impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a cohort of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Methods Patients with a diagnosis of PMR (fulfilling the 2012 EULAR/ACR Provisional Classification Criteria), who were in clinical remission and on active treatment with glucocorticoids were recruited from two centres. Patients were &amp;gt;3 months and &amp;lt;12 months from diagnosis. Frailty was defined by the 5 criteria of the widely validated Fried Phenotypic Frailty Index. Patient-reported outcomes included anxiety, using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), fatigue using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F), pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and overall health related quality of life using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). The associations between categorical variables were compared using the -test or Fishers exact test. The association between continuous variables and categorical variables was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s r. All analyses were conducted using R (R Core Team, 2022). A p-value of &amp;lt; 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results 51 consecutive patients were recruited, of which 56.9% (n = 29) were female. Using the Fried Phenotypic Index, 64.7% (n = 33) were classified as robust, 27.5% (n = 14) as pre-frail and 7.8% (n = 4) as frail. All patients classified as frail were female and had a statistically significantly higher BMI (p = 0.040) than those in the robust and pre-frail categories. Compared to robust individuals, those who were frail had statistically significant higher median GAD-7 (p = 0.003), PHQ-9 (p = 0.001), VAS (p = &amp;lt;0.001) and HAQ-DI (p = &amp;lt;0.001) scores. FACIT-F scores were also worse in those who were frail versus robust (p = 0.001). Conclusion Over one third of patients with PMR in this cohort were classified as pre-frail or frail. Increased frailty status was significantly correlated with worse PROs, including mood, pain, fatigue and overall quality of life. As frailty is a potentially reversible state, accurately identifying frailty, and implementing appropriate interventions is of utmost importance to ensure improved clinical outcomes in those with PMR. Disclosure P. Harkins: Grants/research support; British Society for Rheumatology. S. Cowley: None. R. Harrington: None. D. Kane: None. R. Conway: None.

P117 Efficacy of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Week 156 results from a long-term extension study

Abstract Background/Aims In the treatment of RA, JAK inhibitors are a valuable option to meet remission or low disease activity (LDA) treatment targets following an inadequate response (IR) or intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). FIL is a JAK1 preferential inhibitor available in two doses for the treatment of moderate to severe RA. Objectives: To evaluate long-term efficacy of two doses of FIL in clinically relevant pt populations. Methods In this interim analysis, efficacy (non-responder imputation) of FIL 200 mg (FIL200) and 100 mg (FIL100) was assessed from LTE baseline (BL) to W156 in pts with an IR to methotrexate (MTX-IR) and biologics (bDMARD-IR), enrolled from FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) and 2 (NCT02873936) parent studies (PS), respectively, receiving ≥1 FIL dose in FINCH 4 (NCT03025308). Results Study design, BL characteristics and W48 outcomes for MTX-IR1 and bDMARD-IR2 pts were reported previously. For MTX-IR and bDMARD-IR pts who received FIL200 or FIL100 in the PS, W156 remission rates using Boolean 1.0 criteria were 20.5% and 15.8%, and 18.2% and 8.9%, respectively. Adopting the Boolean 2.0 criteria slightly increased remission rates for FIL200 and FIL100 at W156: +4.2% and +4.9% for MTX-IR pts, and +1.5% and +2.4% for bDMARD-IR pts, respectively. For pts rerandomized to FIL on entering the LTE, Boolean 2.0 criteria also increased remission rates vs Boolean 1.0. Both MTX-IR and bDMARD-IR pts maintained long-term Boolean remission through W156 with FIL200 and FIL100, irrespective of prior FIL. Results for Disease Activity Score 28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) &amp;lt;2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8, and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤3.3, and mean change from PS BL in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and pain are shown (Table). Similar trends in efficacy were seen for LDA and ACR response criteria. Conclusion In FINCH 4, both FIL200 and FIL100 showed sustained efficacy up to W156 in clinically relevant pt populations. Boolean 2.0 criteria classified more pts in remission, in line with the range reported in the validation study. Disclosure M.H. Buch: Consultancies; AbbVie, CESAS Medical, Galapagos, Gilead, and Pfizer (all paid to host institution). Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie (paid to host institution). Grants/research support; Gilead (paid to host institution). D. Aletaha: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and Sanofi. R. Caporali: Consultancies; AbbVie, Fresenius, Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Fresenius, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. B. Combe: Consultancies; AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Roche-Chugai. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche-Chugai. H. Schulze-Koops: Consultancies; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, and Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, and Pfizer. J. Gottenberg: Consultancies; AbbVie, BMS, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; BMS and Pfizer. Y. Tanaka: Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Pfizer. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Takeda. R. Blanco: Consultancies; AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. Grants/research support; AbbVie and Roche. T. Takeuchi: Consultancies; AbbVie GK, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen Pharm K.K., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Pfizer Japan Inc. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie GK, AYUMI, BMS, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen Pharm K.K., Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer Japan Inc., and Sanofi K.K. Grants/research support; AbbVie GK, Asahi-Kasei Pharma, Astellas, AYUMI, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Nippon Kayaku, and UCB Japan. E. V. Ekoka Omoruyi: Consultancies; Galapagos and Janssen. Shareholder/stock ownership; UCB. K. Van Beneden: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Employee of Galapagos. V. Rajendran: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Employee of Galapagos. C. Watson: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos. Other; Employee of Galapagos. F. De Leonardis: Other; Employee of Galapagos. P. Emery: Consultancies; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Samsung. Grants/research support; AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung.

P183 Cognitive function in polymyalgia rheumatica

Abstract Background/Aims Over the past decade our understanding of the prevalence, and indeed impact, of cognitive impairment in rheumatic diseases has increased. An aging population coupled with systemic inflammation have been postulated as key drivers of increased cognitive decline in these conditions. Intact cognitive function is imperative not only for quality of life and maintenance of one’s functional capacity, but also for the successful therapeutic management of disease, namely the adherence to treatment regimens. The prevalence of cognitive impairment in community dwelling adults above the age of 65 in Ireland has been estimated at 13%.1 To date, the prevalence of cognitive impairment in PMR has not been studied. The aim of this research is therefore to explore the prevalence and potential associated factors of cognitive impairment in those with PMR. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of PMR (fulfilling the 2012 EULAR/ACR Provisional Classification Criteria) who were in clinical remission and on active treatment with glucocorticoids were recruited from two centres. Patients were &amp;gt;3 months and &amp;lt;12 months from diagnosis. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test which was conducted by trained interviewers. Cognitive impairment was defined by the previously validated MoCA cut-off score of &amp;lt; 26. Demographics, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to patient reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. PROs included anxiety using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), fatigue using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F), pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and overall health-related quality of life using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). The associations between categorical variables were compared using the -test or Fishers exact test. The association between continuous variables and categorical variables were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s r. All analyses were conducted using R (R Core Team, 2022). A p-value of &amp;lt; 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results 51 consecutive patients with PMR were recruited, of which 56.9% (n = 29) were female. 70.6% (n = 36) of patients were cognitively impaired, with visuo-spatial, delayed recall and abstraction the most commonly affected cognitive domains. Interestingly, those with cognitive impairment had a younger age, versus those without (p = 0.514). Although not statistically significant, median BMI, anxiety, depression and pain scores were all higher in those who were cognitively impaired. Moreover, median fatigue scores were also worse in the cognitively impaired group. No statistically significant difference in serum markers was observed. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the burden of cognitive impairment in PMR is significant, and is markedly higher than that observed usually at population level. Future studies exploring specific etiologic contributors are needed. Disclosure P. Harkins: Grants/research support; British Society for Rheumatology. S. Cowley: None. R. Harrington: None. D. Kane: None. R. Conway: None.

P116 Effectiveness and safety of biosimilar etanercept GP2015 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK: results from the COMPACT study

Abstract Background/Aims COMPACT is a non-interventional, multinational cohort study to evaluate effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with GP2015, an approved etanercept (ETN) biosimilar, under real-world conditions. Here, we present data from patients in the UK with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the COMPACT study, focusing on those who switched to GP2015 from reference ETN or another biosimilar ETN. Methods The COMPACT study included patients (≥18 years of age) with rheumatic diseases treated with GP2015. This analysis includes patients from the UK diagnosed with RA who were in treatment Group A (patients in clinical remission or low disease activity under treatment with reference ETN or other biosimilar ETN, who switched to GP2015 prior to study enrolment). Effectiveness and QoL outcomes were assessed using Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28) and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), respectively, and are presented up to Week 24. Safety outcomes were assessed, including rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Results A total of 112 patients with RA who switched to GP2015 from reference ETN or another biosimilar ETN (Group A) were enrolled in the UK. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 62.9 ± 11.3 years and 74.1% of patients were female. The mean ± SD DAS28 score remained unchanged from baseline (2.6 ± 1.3) to Week 24 (2.5 ± 1.6). The mean ± SD HAQ-DI score displayed no major difference between baseline (1.2 ± 0.8) and Week 24 (0.9 ± 0.8). Overall, 67.9% (n = 76) of patients experienced ≥1 AE and 9.8% (n = 11) of patients experienced ≥1 SAE (Table). Conclusion Over 24 weeks of treatment with GP2015, disease activity remained low and stable in patients with RA previously switched from reference ETN or from another biosimilar ETN, with no new safety concerns observed. These results from a cohort of patients with RA treated in the UK are consistent with effectiveness, QoL and safety data reported previously for the total population in the COMPACT study. Disclosure A. Askari: None. C. Both: None. A. Martin: None. D.A. Walsh: Consultancies; Consultancy fees paid to University of Nottingham: Contura International A/S, Glaxo SmithKline, AKL Research and Development Ltd, Consultancy fees paid to University of Nottingham: Pfizer Ltd, Abbvie Ltd, Ely Lilly &amp; Co.Ltd, Galapagos Ltd., Reckitt Benckiser Health Ltd. Honoraria; Speaker fees paid to David Walsh: Irish Society of Rheumatology, Speaker fees paid to University of Nottingham: Medscape International, Pfizer Ltd, Abbvie Ltd. Grants/research support; Grants paid to University of Nottingham: Versus Arthritis, UKRI, NIHR, Nuffield Foundation, Pfizer Ltd, Ely Lilly &amp; Co Ltd, UCB Pharma, Grants paid to University of Nottingham: GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Orion Corporation. T. Sheeran: None.

P168 The impact of psoriatic arthritis on quality of life and lifestyle: a systematic review

Abstract Background/Aims Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects adults of all ages. It is common for patients to experience a wide variety of physical and psychological problems. The objective of this systematic review was to determine how PsA impacts a person's quality of life (QoL). Methods A systematic literature search of CENTRAL, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases was conducted on 28th May 2021. Title, abstract and whole text screening, and data extraction were completed by two independent authors. The primary outcomes of this study were PsA activity and severity, impact of PsA on lifestyle and QoL. As per the protocol (PROSPERO CRD42021257395), studies which reported at least one of these primary outcomes were included. The quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal criteria. Results Of the 20,316 papers identified by the search strategy, 42 papers which reported on at least one of the study primary outcomes were included in the review. 38 studies reported on PsA activity and severity, 26 on impact of PsA on lifestyle and 23 on QoL. 7 different measures were used to assess impact of PsA on lifestyle, including Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) (n = 13), modified HAQs (n = 10), PsA impact of disease measure (n = 2), functional capacity ACR (n = 1), functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (n = 1), Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (n = 1) and a patient-directed question (n = 1). 13 papers reported an average HAQ score between 0.13 and 1.3 for PsA participants. Two studies which reported HAQ disability index compared PsA participants to other groups. Thus, the impact of disease on lifestyle is worse for PsA compared to psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls, psoriasis. DAPSA and PASI were the most used disease activity scores in addition to various patient-reported outcomes. The average DAPSA was 15.5, suggesting that the majority of PsA patients have moderate disease activity. Although the average PASI (skin) score showed mild disease among the PsA (3.82) group, a high PASI score was associated with late/never minimal disease activity and obesity. 8 different measures were used to assess QoL, including Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life (n = 6, average), EQ-5D (n = 4), EQ-3D (n = 1), DLQI (n = 7), SF-36 (n = 3), SF-12 (n = 1), WHOQOL-BREF (n = 2), PSQI (n = 1), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (n = 1) and Psoriasis disability index (n = 1). Except for QoL for skin (DLQI), PsA was associated with worse outcomes in all these measures, in comparison with spondylarthritis, healthy control and psoriasis only groups. Conclusion PsA significantly affects a patient's life and health-related QoL. The degree of activity and severity of the disease have a substantial impact. Therefore, for patients with high disease activity, specific management plans should be discussed and facilitated to maintain their mobility and functional abilities. Disclosure L. James: None. R. Suribhatla: None. L.H. Hailey: None. R. Amarnani: None. C. Bundy: None. D. McGagh: None. S. Kirtley: None. D. O'Sullivan: None. I. Steinkoenig: None. L.C. Coates: None.

Responsiveness and sensitivity of PROMs to change in disease activity status in early and established rheumatoid arthritis.

To determine whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) capturing activity limitations, health impact, pain, fatigue and work ability are responsive and sensitive to changes in disease activity status in patients with early and established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). All early RA patients (n = 557) from the tREACH-trial and established RA patients (n = 188) from the TARA-trial were included. Both studies were multicentre, single-blinded trials with a treat-to-target management approach. The following PROMs were studied: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index(HAQ-DI), morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D, general health, 36-item short form(SF-36), joint pain, fatigue and productivity loss. Mean changes in PROMs between two consecutive visits were compared with changes in disease activity status(remission, low disease activity and active disease) using linear mixed models and standardised response means. Additionally, the proportion of individual observations that showed an expected PROM response to disease activity status alterations was calculated. HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, general health, EQ-5D and joint pain demonstrated responsiveness to improvement or worsening of disease activity status in both early and established RA. SF-36 physical and mental component scale, fatigue and productivity loss did not show this effect in both groups. Across nearly all PROMs, the magnitude of change and the proportion of individual observations that reflect a shift from and to active disease remained low. HAQ-DI, morning stiffness severity, EQ-5D, general health and joint pain are responsive to disease activity status alterations on a group level in both early and established RA. For the individual patient the responsiveness of these PROMs is poor. tREACH trial (www.isrctn.com, ISRCTN26791028) and TARA trial (www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl, NTR2754).

Central sensitivity syndrome affects the disease activity index and treatment satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Many rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients prioritize pain improvement in treatment. As pain can result from various causes, including noninflammatory factors such as central sensitivity syndrome (CSS), we hypothesized that CSS might impact treatment satisfaction. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the CSS effects on clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction in RA patients. In total, 220 consecutive RA patients receiving long-term follow-up were evaluated for clinical disease activity and treatment satisfaction. CSS was evaluated using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). An overall score of ≥40 indicates the presence of CSS. We queried "How satisfied are you with your treatment?"; answers included (a) very satisfied, (b) satisfied, (c) not satisfied, or (d) very dissatisfied. For univariate analysis, we condensed these answers into "dissatisfied" or "satisfied." We also evaluated treatment satisfaction using the visual analog scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 mm (very dissatisfied) to 100 mm (very satisfied). Of the 220 patients, 17 (7.7%) were classified as having CSS. CSI score was significantly correlated with the clinical disease activity index (CDAI; r = .322, p < .01) and treatment satisfaction (r = -.336, p < .01). Regarding treatment satisfaction, univariate analysis revealed that patient global assessment (PtGA), pain VAS, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein, CDAI, and CSI scores of patients who were satisfied with treatment differed significantly from those of dissatisfied patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that CSI, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were associated with treatment satisfaction. In RA patients, CSS may affect the disease activity index and reduce treatment satisfaction.

Prognostic and functional importance of both overt and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in systemic sclerosis

ObjectivesTo quantify the frequency and clinical implications of systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated left ventricular function (LV) impairment. MethodsAustralian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants meeting ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc with ≥1 echocardiographic LVEF measurement were included. Overt LV dysfunction was indicated by reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and subclinical LV dysfunction was measured using impaired LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS>-16%). Those with secondary causes of LV dysfunction (myocardial ischaemia, valvulopathy and pulmonary arterial hypertension) were excluded. Chi-squared tests, two-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for between-group comparison as appropriate. Generalised estimating equations(GEE) were used to model longitudinal data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analyses. ResultsOf 1141 participants with no co-morbid cardiac disease, 2.4% ever recorded a LVEF<50%, while only 0.6% ever recorded a LVEF≤40%. LV-GLS data were available for 90% of participants at one centre (n=218). Impaired LV-GLS was detected in 21% despite LVEF≥50%. Those with a LVEF<50% were more frequently male (p=0.01) with dcSSc (p<0.01), higher inflammatory markers (p<0.02) and skeletal muscle disease (p<0.05). In multivariable analyses, recording a LVEF<50% was associated with increased mortality (HR2.3, 95%CI1.0-4.8, p=0.04). Impaired LV-GLS was also associated with poorer survival in univariable analyses (HR3.4, 95%CI1.0-11.8, p=0.05). Those with a LVEF<50% more frequently recorded WHO Class III/IV dyspnoea (OR3.5, 95%CI1.6-7.7, p<0.01), with shorter six-minute walk distance (p=0.01), higher Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (p<0.01) and lower Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary scores (p=0.02). Increased dyspnoea (WHO Class III/IV dyspnoea; OR3.6, 95%CI1.4-9.2, p<0.01) was also seen in those with impaired LV-GLS. ConclusionsBoth overt and subclinical SSc-associated LV dysfunction are associated with worse survival and impaired physical function. The frequency of abnormal LV-GLS in those with consistently normal LVEF suggests an under-appreciated burden of subtle LV systolic dysfunction in SSc that has a significant impact on patient symptomatology.

Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment With Deucravacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

Deucravacitinib, a tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, was assessed in a phase 2 trial in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report effects of deucravacitinib from the patient perspective. This phase 2, double-blind trial (NCT03881059) randomized patients with active PsA 1:1:1 to deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (QD), 12 mg QD, or placebo, for 16 weeks. Key secondary end points were changes from baseline (CFBs) at week 16 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores. Additional patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed disease impact, including fatigue, pain, and mental health. The mean CFBs in PROs and percentages of patients reporting improvements with minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) or scores of greater than normal values were also assessed. This study comprised 203 patients (51.2% female; mean ± SD age, 49.8 ± 13.5 years). At week 16, the adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval) versus placebo in HAQ-DI and SF-36 PCS CFB was significant for each deucravacitinib group (HAQ-DI 6 mg, -0.26 [-0.42 to -0.10], P = 0.0020; HAQ-DI 12 mg, -0.28 [-0.45 to -0.12], P = 0.0008; SF-36 PCS 6 mg, 3.3 [0.9 to 5.7], P = 0.0062; SF-36 PCS 12 mg, 3.5 [1.1 to 5.9], P = 0.0042). MCID at week 16 were reported for all PROs with either dose of deucravacitinib. Improvements of MCID or to normative values were reported by more patients receiving deucravacitinib than placebo. Deucravacitinib groups demonstrate significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs versus placebo in patients with active PsA, which warrants further study.

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To summarize and analyze the results of published randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis(PsA) and discuss its efficacy and safety. An exhaustive systematic search encompassing PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 2023. Studies eligible for inclusion were analyzed, organized using Review Manager version 5.4.1 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and STATA 15.0 version (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) software. A total of six articles, covering 1393 patients (844 treated with tofacitinib and 549 with placebo), were included. The foundational characteristics of tofacitinib and placebo group showed similarity, except for age and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, especially in the context of chronic plaque psoriasis. It is noteworthy that we discovered tofacitinib exhibited a significant impact on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response, and adverse events (AEs) in cases of chronic plaque psoriasis. Similarly, tofacitinib demonstrated substantial influence on American College of Rheumatology 20/50 (ACR20/50) response, PASI75 response, as well as alterations in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score, Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS), and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) Score in the context of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant impact of tofacitinib on serious adverse events (SAEs) in chronic plaque psoriasis, as well as on both adverse events (AEs) and SAEs in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A comprehensive analysis revealed that tofacitinib has a positive effect on addressing skin and joint symptoms, as well as improving the quality of life for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, the safety of the drug's long-term usage even requires further validation. Key Points • In 6 analyses involving a total of 1393 patients, tofacitinib exhibits positive effect on the treatment of both chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • Although dose-based subgroup analyses have demonstrated effectiveness. Some studies indicate that the 5-mg dose (twice daily) may not show an effect due to the failure of non-inferiority trials comparing tofacitinib with placebo. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting its effectiveness. On the other hand, the 10-mg dose (BID) has been associated with an increase in adverse events and serious adverse events,and is recommended to be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular or uveitis risk factors. • Tofacitinib has efficacy in comorbid psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, or Alzheimer's disease) and inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis), but patients with comorbid renal insufficiency, hepatic dysfunction, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, or uveitis may need to be moderated or avoided with tofacitinib.

Association between enthesitis/dactylitis resolution and patient-reported outcomes in guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis

ObjectivesTo evaluate the association between enthesitis resolution (ER) and dactylitis resolution (DR) and meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among biologic-naïve patients with PsA receiving guselkumab in the DISCOVER-2 study.MethodsEnthesitis and dactylitis, characteristic lesions of PsA, were evaluated by independent assessors using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (range, 0–6) and Dactylitis Severity Score (range, 0–60). Proportions of patients with ER or DR (score = 0) among those with score > 0 at baseline were determined at weeks 24, 52, and 100. PROs included: fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-Fatigue]), pain (0–100 visual analog scale), physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]), and health-related quality of life (36-item Short-Form Health Survey physical/mental component summary [SF-36 PCS/MCS]). Meaningful responses were defined as: improvements of ≥ 4 for FACIT-Fatigue, ≥ 0.35 for HAQ-DI, and ≥ 5 for SF-36 PCS/MCS and absolute scores of ≤ 15 for minimal pain and ≤ 0.5 for normalized HAQ-DI. Associations between ER/DR status and PRO response status were tested using a Chi-square test.ResultsGuselkumab-treated patients with ER were more likely than those without ER to achieve minimal pain (p < 0.001), normalized HAQ-DI (p < 0.001), and PCS response (p < 0.05) at weeks 24, 52, and 100. Patients with DR were more likely than those without DR to achieve FACIT-Fatigue response at week 24 and week 52 (both p ≤ 0.01) and minimal pain at week 24 and normalized HAQ-DI at week 52 (both p ≤ 0.03).ConclusionIn biologic-naïve patients with active PsA treated with guselkumab, achieving ER or DR was associated with durable improvements in selected PROs, including those of high importance to patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov) NCT03158285; Registered: May 16, 2017.Key Points• At week 100, 65% and 76% of guselkumab-treated patients achieved enthesitis and dactylitis resolution (ER/DR).• Achieving ER was associated with achieving DR and vice versa through the end of study.• Achieving ER or DR was associated with durable and meaningful improvements in selected patient-reported outcomes.

Effectiveness of asfotase alfa for treatment of adults with hypophosphatasia: results from a global registry

BackgroundHypophosphatasia (HPP) is a rare inherited disease caused by deficient activity of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase. Many adults with HPP have a high burden of disease, experiencing chronic pain, fatigue, limited mobility, and dental issues, contributing to decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HPP may be treated with the enzyme replacement therapy asfotase alfa though real-world data in adults are limited. This analysis was conducted to assess the clinical effectiveness of asfotase alfa among adults in the Global HPP Registry.MethodsThe Global HPP Registry is an observational, prospective, multinational study. Adults ≥ 18 years of age were included in this analysis if they had serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity below the age- and sex-adjusted reference ranges, and/or ALPL variant(s), and received asfotase alfa for ≥ 6 months. Mobility was assessed with the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and patient-reported outcomes tools were used to assess pain (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form), quality of life (36-item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 [SF-36v2]), and disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) at multiple time points from baseline through Month 36. Data were collected as per usual standard of care; patients may not have contributed data at all time points.ResultsA total of 190 patients met the inclusion criteria. For patients with ≥ 1 follow-up measurement, the mean distance achieved on 6MWT increased from 404 m (range 60–632 m) at baseline (n = 31) to 484 m at Month 12 (range 240–739 m; n = 18) and remained above baseline through Month 36 (n = 7). Improvements in mean self-reported pain severity scores ranged from − 0.72 (95% CI: − 1.23, − 0.21; n = 38) to − 1.13 (95% CI: − 1.76, − 0.51; n = 26) and were observed at all time points. Improvements in the Physical Component Summary score of SF-36v2 were achieved by Month 6 and sustained throughout follow-up. There was a trend toward improvement in the Mental Component Summary score of SF-36v2 at most time points, with considerable fluctuations from Months 12 (n = 28) through 36 (n = 21). The most frequent adverse events were injection site reactions.ConclusionsAdults with HPP who received asfotase alfa for ≥ 6 months experienced improvements in mobility, physical function, and HRQoL, which were maintained over 3 years of follow-up.Registration: NCT02306720; EUPAS13514.